I'm taking a different approach with this post, and perhaps some others in the future. I've decided this time to express some of my thoughts in poetry, or in this case what might be termed "free verse". That is, I like to write sometimes in a way that doesn't necessarily have the rhyme or tempo of traditional poetry, although there are hints of them here and there.
I've found this to be an extremely effective way to basically throw some of my thoughts into words when I'm having a time of intense or abundant thought - when I can just close my eyes and type them out at break-neck speed (in my case around 70 words per minute) and not worry about making complete sentences.
For future reference, any post that I write in poetry will have the title IN BOLD LETTERING like this post. Here goes, and may God speak to your heart about what you read ...
The Blind Leading The Blind
Oprah Winfrey doesn’t have the answers
Eckhart Tolle doesn’t have the answers
Stephen Hawking doesn’t have the answers
Rhonda Byrne doesn’t have the answers
If they did, then why do they still seek?
Why do they never find?
Why do they lack peace?
Books and magazines
“Today’s special guest”
Self-delusion makes a name
Mass-delusion makes a profit
And the masses follow
Blind and led by blind masters
Too busy to seek Truth
Seeking riches, seeking youth
So they accept the lies of others
Without question, without thought
Together they stumble
They wander ever closer
To a pit, The Pit
Truly, they have their reward
Their reward is near
Nothing eternal
They live for right here
Choosing the wide path
That leads to destruction
God is too inconvenient
Bad for their name
Bad for profit
So they keep up the game
Of delusion, denial
“Put Him out of your mind
He’s dead, He’s blind
As if I’ll stand before Him one day
The Bible’s a lie”
Or so they say
They may be here now
But what about tomorrow?
What about death?
What about you – Who do you choose??
If you're a non-believer, welcome to a safe place to learn things about God and to see Him for who He really is, not according to religion or any stereotypes and misconceptions that you may have.
If you're a believer, here's a chance to be challenged and encouraged in your faith.
Starting with the first (oldest) post is a good idea, because it's more than just the official greeting to this site - you're offered a challenge as well!
If you're a believer, here's a chance to be challenged and encouraged in your faith.
Starting with the first (oldest) post is a good idea, because it's more than just the official greeting to this site - you're offered a challenge as well!
Showing posts with label relativism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relativism. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Old vs. outdated
Some people make the assumption that the Bible is outdated simply because it's old, because the last book accepted into the canon of Scripture occurred nearly 2,000 years ago. But when you think about it, being outdated has nothing to do with age but entirely to do with not being relevant to today.
Consider the fascination with Shakespeare in drama and English classes worldwide hundreds of years after the bard's death. Think about how the original design of things like the light bulb and the camera are still recognizable in modern light bulbs and cameras over 100 years later. These things might be considered as old, but their modern relevance and influence prove that they are not outdated.
If you question the relevance of the Bible in our modern world, do the following:
The only difference between these modern acts and those recorded in the Bible are the fact that they are being committed by people in different cultures and nations using different technology and following different trends. Whereas in ancient times some cultures burned their babies alive in the arms of scalding hot idols, we allow girls and women in our civilized, sophisticated modern age to have their unborn child ground into bits and vacuumed from their innards using some of the most intricate surgical instruments and techniques. Such a practice is not considered barbaric because it is so methodical and sterilized.
Apparently, the accounts (actually disproven myths) of women using coat hangers in back alleys was too inhumane and gruesome for those in the women's liberation movement of the early 1970s to stomach, but I digress. History since that time has proven that the legalization of abortion was done to serve selfish political, financial, and scientific interests among others, but I raise this issue as an example of how the mere acceptance of this practice is one of countless proofs of how human nature - in this case lying, greed, and selfishness - have only changed in form, not in substance.
While I'm on the topic of relevance, I can't help but question that of the Theory of Evolution in our modern age. (You can look at the keyword archive in this blog for other thoughts that God has revealed to me about this and other topics.) Scientific understanding of the workings of the human body were elementary at best at the time of the publishing of The Origin of Species in 1859: scientists knew what was inside the body at a non-molecular level, but little was known about how body systems and organs worked and interacted. And nobody - including Darwin himself - had any idea of the unfathomable intricacy and sophistication of the workings of the human body that scream "Design!". In addition, apart from the human body and that of other mammals, the literally infinite vastness of the universe was unknown and atomic structure was unheard of.
Therefore, this theory at its core is based on outdated science despite all claims to the contrary, on assumptions based upon the scientific understandings (and misunderstandings) of the time that modern science has since largely disproven. Yet you'll rarely hear about anyone who lacks a true understanding of God, any non-Christian, questioning its relevance in this modern age. The modern proponents of this theory, who continually churn out new sub-theories to cover up the ones that modern science continues to disprove, gain influence and keep the dead horse of evolutionary theory alive as they wax eloquent and get the Oprah seal of approval for their new book about their new theory - as she has largely replaced God and His Word as the beacon of modern moral, spiritual, and scientific wisdom in pop culture, and apparently in the evolutionist community as well.
Yet begin to seriously ask objective, frank questions about their beliefs - which are different in substance but no different in magnitude from those of Christians - and you get accused of being what they themselves are: narrow-minded, subjective, and worst of all, "religious" (whether you actually believe in God or not). The saddest part about the believer of evolutionary theory is that they don't realize that they are themselves disciples of a religion, that of Evolution, the new religion of this relativistic and humanistic world we now live in.
So even though some things are considered relevant in this modern age, we see now how they can be outdated. Fortunately, anyone looking for something solid to stand on, something that won't be disproven 5, 50, 500, or even 5,000 years from now, need look no further than the Bible, the only true Scriptures and truth in existence. The Bible is the only body of writings whose truth and claims have withstood all persecutions, all examinations, and all other tests of time. (If you think you've found a new way to poke holes in its truth and absolute integrity and sink it once and for all, I urge you to do so, but I can guarantee that you cannot do so with an objective mind.)
If you haven't dug into the Bible because you believe that it's outdated and therefore irrelevant and a waste of time, or because you believe the hype that it's a book of fairy tales or riddled with "internal contradictions" and so forth rather than just letting it speak to you on its own merit, then you're missing out on the greatest adventure of this life and the one beyond. But don't just take my word for it: be objective and find out for yourself.
Consider the fascination with Shakespeare in drama and English classes worldwide hundreds of years after the bard's death. Think about how the original design of things like the light bulb and the camera are still recognizable in modern light bulbs and cameras over 100 years later. These things might be considered as old, but their modern relevance and influence prove that they are not outdated.
If you question the relevance of the Bible in our modern world, do the following:
- Read the first ten verses of 2 Timothy chapter 3 and ask yourself if this doesn't with absolute precision describe the world of today, "the last days" that the Bible repeatedly refers to.
- Read Romans chapter 1 from verse 18 to the end of the chapter and ask yourself if the moral abyss the world currently finds itself in has ever been better explained than in this portion of Scripture.
The only difference between these modern acts and those recorded in the Bible are the fact that they are being committed by people in different cultures and nations using different technology and following different trends. Whereas in ancient times some cultures burned their babies alive in the arms of scalding hot idols, we allow girls and women in our civilized, sophisticated modern age to have their unborn child ground into bits and vacuumed from their innards using some of the most intricate surgical instruments and techniques. Such a practice is not considered barbaric because it is so methodical and sterilized.
Apparently, the accounts (actually disproven myths) of women using coat hangers in back alleys was too inhumane and gruesome for those in the women's liberation movement of the early 1970s to stomach, but I digress. History since that time has proven that the legalization of abortion was done to serve selfish political, financial, and scientific interests among others, but I raise this issue as an example of how the mere acceptance of this practice is one of countless proofs of how human nature - in this case lying, greed, and selfishness - have only changed in form, not in substance.
While I'm on the topic of relevance, I can't help but question that of the Theory of Evolution in our modern age. (You can look at the keyword archive in this blog for other thoughts that God has revealed to me about this and other topics.) Scientific understanding of the workings of the human body were elementary at best at the time of the publishing of The Origin of Species in 1859: scientists knew what was inside the body at a non-molecular level, but little was known about how body systems and organs worked and interacted. And nobody - including Darwin himself - had any idea of the unfathomable intricacy and sophistication of the workings of the human body that scream "Design!". In addition, apart from the human body and that of other mammals, the literally infinite vastness of the universe was unknown and atomic structure was unheard of.
Therefore, this theory at its core is based on outdated science despite all claims to the contrary, on assumptions based upon the scientific understandings (and misunderstandings) of the time that modern science has since largely disproven. Yet you'll rarely hear about anyone who lacks a true understanding of God, any non-Christian, questioning its relevance in this modern age. The modern proponents of this theory, who continually churn out new sub-theories to cover up the ones that modern science continues to disprove, gain influence and keep the dead horse of evolutionary theory alive as they wax eloquent and get the Oprah seal of approval for their new book about their new theory - as she has largely replaced God and His Word as the beacon of modern moral, spiritual, and scientific wisdom in pop culture, and apparently in the evolutionist community as well.
Yet begin to seriously ask objective, frank questions about their beliefs - which are different in substance but no different in magnitude from those of Christians - and you get accused of being what they themselves are: narrow-minded, subjective, and worst of all, "religious" (whether you actually believe in God or not). The saddest part about the believer of evolutionary theory is that they don't realize that they are themselves disciples of a religion, that of Evolution, the new religion of this relativistic and humanistic world we now live in.
So even though some things are considered relevant in this modern age, we see now how they can be outdated. Fortunately, anyone looking for something solid to stand on, something that won't be disproven 5, 50, 500, or even 5,000 years from now, need look no further than the Bible, the only true Scriptures and truth in existence. The Bible is the only body of writings whose truth and claims have withstood all persecutions, all examinations, and all other tests of time. (If you think you've found a new way to poke holes in its truth and absolute integrity and sink it once and for all, I urge you to do so, but I can guarantee that you cannot do so with an objective mind.)
If you haven't dug into the Bible because you believe that it's outdated and therefore irrelevant and a waste of time, or because you believe the hype that it's a book of fairy tales or riddled with "internal contradictions" and so forth rather than just letting it speak to you on its own merit, then you're missing out on the greatest adventure of this life and the one beyond. But don't just take my word for it: be objective and find out for yourself.
Labels:
abortion,
Bible,
evolutionism,
human nature,
humanism,
Oprah Winfrey,
relativism,
science,
Theory of Evolution
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)